Re: Module: Okapi
The reason I decided not to use configuration files is that changing an sma and compiling is very easy and actually makes it faster for someone to: notice that a plugin was updated, updating by replacing files (you just have one file to update), see signatures that are being used in a plugin just by looking at a sma.
But what Arkshine said about centralizing signatures makes sense. And it can be added to okapi without changing it's way of working just like an extra feature. I may make it one day. :twisted: Emp, it's just the animal name :twisted: Anyone already have tried to work with treemaps? |
Re: Module: Okapi
Quote:
|
Re: Module: Okapi
Quote:
Quote:
Win / Linux / OSX cross treemaps compatibility should be awesome (I know, it's impossible but...) |
Re: Module: Okapi
1 Attachment(s)
Anyone knows about this error? (if traduction needed, tell me)
|
Re: Module: Okapi
You can put the translation, but I think it says basically it doesn't found such function in Kernel32.dll, right ?
Do you have win XP or 2003 ? |
Re: Module: Okapi
Quote:
|
Re: Module: Okapi
1 Attachment(s)
What about this.
|
Re: Module: Okapi
Quote:
|
Re: Module: Okapi
In s_library.cpp, where it uses GetModuleInformation, I've added :
#pragma comment(lib, "Psapi.lib") #pragma comment(lib, "Kernel32.lib") #define PSAPI_VERSION 1 So, it will use Psapi.lib instead. With windows 7, some changes have been done around this function and to keep compatibility with XP, you need to laod Psapi and define PSAPI version to 1. |
Re: Module: Okapi
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.